|  |  |  |  | 
						
							|  | Articles 
            from 2000: |  | Key: | 
						
							|  |  |  | 
									
										| Traffic 
                  Action Committee |  
										| Join 
                  our Action Committee to work with the County on signals, 
                  speeding and other traffic and pedestrian issues. |        | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | I-25 
            to the south - reconstruction beginning Fall 2000 From us 
            to the Meadows/Founders exit |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | What's 
            ahead for I-25? Planning 
            for the Year 2020 |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | U.S. 
            85 Talks 
            about Titan Road improvement and future plans for this major corridor. |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | Future 
            visions for transportation management Talks about the committee's 
            proposals for our area |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | Buses, 
            what about bus routes? Another look at that issue |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | Daniels 
            Park Road? Talks about different segments of the Road, its 
            uses and whether portions will be paved. |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | Forest 
            Park/Castle Pines Village connection is resolved; access will 
            not go through CPN |  | 
						
							| 10-00 |  | Workshops 
            to discuss access/road use for Castle Pines Village residential development |  | 
						
							| 10-00 |  | Traffic 
            lights in CPN Talks about probable locations for speed control |  | 
						
							| 10-00 |  | Long 
            term plans for the I-25/US 85 corridors 
            Talks about the future plans for these major corridors. |  | 
						
							| 10-00 |  | US 
            85 Talks about the improvements planned for this road |  | 
						
							| 10-00 |  | I-25 
            Interchanges and overpasses Projects on schedule for 
            interchanges |  | 
						
							| 9-00 |  | Phase 
            II of I-25 lane expansion Between us and Meadows/Founders |  | 
						
							| 8-00 |  | Expanding 
            I-25 to 6 lanes, with "safety improvements" |  | 
						
							| 12-99 |  | I-25 
            and US 85 Approved Projects What was approved by Referendum 
            A, Nov. 1999 |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 4-30 |  | The 
            paving of Daniels Park Road |  | 
						
							|  |  | CPN 
              residents have adamantly opposed a plan to have Castle Pines Village 
              traffic - including construction traffic - come through Castle Pines 
              Parkway via a "North Gate" that would have connected via Forest 
              Park Drive. We have been successful in negotiating an alternative. 
              The new plan includes sending construction traffic from Castle Pines 
              Village south to US 85 via Daniels Park Road.  The 
              EPA is requiring that dirt roads in the northern portion of Douglas 
              County be paved, because of the dust we contribute to Denver's infamous 
              brown cloud. The chemical that is currently being used to reduce 
              the dust is damaging trees along the route and is also a fire hazard. 
              So paving will happen eventually; the only question is "when". The 
              county will do it in multiple "phases" over a period of years, so 
              that they can carefully design the road to reduce impacts. Paving 
              this southern section of Daniels Park Road was already on the county's 
              plans and it has become essential to do the paving of this section 
              of the road this fall, to be able to handle the construction traffic.  Regardless 
              of whether the road surface is dirt or paved, the open land that 
              you see is protected by being part of the Cherokee Ranch, Daniels 
              Park, and the Highlands Ranch Open Space conservation areas. Part 
              of the work for the Daniels Park Road project is to look at alternate 
              routes and design changes that could actually reduce the impact 
              of the road on these open spaces. |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 3-14 |  | Traffic 
            and Safety Committee's meeting schedule |  | 
						
							|  |  | We 
              had our first "Traffic & Safety" Action Committee meeting this month. 
              For those of you who attended -- thanks. If you have previously 
              volunteered for this committee, we have you on the list and will 
              invite you to the next meeting. If you haven't already volunteered 
              but would like to, send an email to [traffic@cpnhoa.org] or call 
              (303) 265-9306.  How 
              do we want to pursue (literally!) this issue? We 
              can use neighborhood speed-watch programs or patrols monitored by 
              the county.  Please 
              give your feedback to the Traffic 
              Committee. |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 3-15 |  | Traffic 
            lights coming to CPN! |  | 
						
							|  |  | Douglas 
              County is beginning the work to install two traffic lights on Castle 
              Pines Parkway, expecting to be completed by early summer. There 
              is a huge lead time involved in this process in getting the signal 
              poles ordered. 
									one 
                at Charter Oaks (across from the Village Square commercial center) 
                The grocery store developers say they will have this installed 
                by the time their store(s) open.one 
                at Monarch Blvd. This 
              is a several month process, the County is projecting completion 
              by summer 2001. The 
              County has said that traffic lights would be installed prior to 
              any of the grocery stores opening. We 
              will want to take a "big picture" look at the traffic 
              signals and signage that make sense throughout CPN and work with 
              the Country to get this done. The 
              need to expand the 2-lane section of CPN (from the commercial area 
              east, and across I-25: The 
              County says they are planning to expand CPN to 4 lanes prior to 
              opening any grocery stores (funding coming from developers). There 
              are no current plans for the bridge or interchange to I-25. Want 
              to help on this one? |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 2-15 |  | Neighborhood 
            Speedwatch Program |  | 
						
							|  |  | There 
              are some neighborhood residents working on a Speedwatch program 
              in CPN. If you are interested in volunteering, send an email to traffic@cpnhoa.org. In 
              other traffic news, the County is out looking at areas that need 
              traffic signals. Join our Action 
              Committee to work with the County on signals, speeding and other 
              traffice and pedestrian issues |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | I-25 
            to the south - reconstruction beginning Fall 2000 |  | 
						
							|  |  | The 
            "cone zone" has shifted to the south as the State begins 
            a reconstruction of I-25 similar to the just finished northern portion 
            of the highway. This reconstruction goes from Exit 188 (Castle Pines 
            Parkway) south to the Meadows/Founders exit. (Check up on it at www.southi25.com) |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | What's 
            ahead for I-25? |  | 
						
							|  |  | Planning 
              has begun for what additional transportaion improvements would be 
              needed to meet traffic needs over the next 20 years, (Linda Nuzum 
              has been participating on the study committee). Discussions 
              of I-25 needs by the Year 2020 include adding another lane, so that 
              there would be 8 lanes total between Lincoln and Meadows/Founders 
              (the current construction project is being designed with this possibility 
              in mind). Also under consideration is to at least preserve the right-of-way 
              for future transit (light rail or buses; park-and-ride facilities 
              that include one immediately to the east of the CPN exit). Even 
              if all these improvements are made by the Year 2020, Douglas County 
              population is expected to grow to the point that I-25 congestion 
              will remain a problem  with these current times looking like 
              the good old days. It becomes imperative to look at having alternate 
              routes.  |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | U.S. 
            85 |  | 
						
							|  |  | The 
            State has one US-85 project on its current funding list: to improve 
            the Titan Road intersection. Over the next several years, the State 
            is also likely to make some incremental improvements, such as passing 
            lanes and some additional left-turn lanes. Longer term, the plan is 
            to widen US 85 to 4 lanes, but this is just in the beginning planning 
            stage. |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | Future 
            visions for transportation management |  | 
						
							|  |  | Highlights 
              from the committees that include government agencies, county residents 
              and interest groupd begun in 1999 (including our representative 
              Linda Nuzum) include the following visions. There are still many 
              steps before finalizing plans including public comments, environmental 
              clearance and funding. But here goes: Highways:
  I-25: Eight 
              lanes, C-470 to Castle Rock 
  U.S. 85: Four 
              lanes, Highlands Ranch Parkway to Castle Rock 
  Relocate the 
              southern end of US 85 to join I-25 south of Castle Rock rather than 
              north of it 
  Interchange 
              improvements 
  Various "management" 
              measures, such as improving response times for clearing accidents. Transit:
  Ultimately, 
              Light Rail from the future southeast corridor transit station near 
              C-470 and I-25 to downtown Castle Rock. Political realities mean 
              this would come later than 2020. 
  Possibly a 
              Front Range rail system that would go from Northern Colorado to 
              Colorado Springs or further south - this would use trains that could 
              follow the path of US 85 from Castle Rock into Denver. 
  Bus Service 
              as a "demonstration" of transit usage and as a "feeder" 
              to other transit lines. 
  In the interim, 
              preserve the right-of-way for future rail options.  Douglas 
              County would need to resolve the issue of responsibility and funding 
              for transit; most of the county does not belong to the Regional 
              Transportation District. Park-and-Ride:
  Park-and-ride 
              lots along I-25, including one east of the Castle Pines Parkway/I-25 
              interchange. 
  A park-and-ride 
              for U.S. 85 at Highlands Ranch Parkway. Other 
              Planning Considerations include:
  Considerations 
              for sound impact on residential areas near the highways. 
  A "wildlife 
              friendly design" for all improvements, particularly in the 
              areas west of U.S. 85. |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | Buses, 
            what about bus routes? |  | 
						
							|  |  | Bus 
              Service has been suggested as a "demonstration" of transit 
              usage and as a "feeder" to other transit lines. The Regional Transportion 
              District plans to start bus service from Highlands Ranch Parkway 
              to Mineral Avenue to work with the Sante Fe light-rail service. Douglas 
              County would need to resolve the issue of responsibility and funding 
              for transit; most of the county does not belong to the Regional 
              Transportation District. |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | Forest 
            Park/Castle Pines Village connection |  | 
						
							|  |  | Last 
              year's proposal to utilize Forest Park Drive for a Castle Pines 
              Village "north gate" are tentatively resolved. Many CPN 
              residents recall the proposal for new homes in the northern section 
              of Castle Pines Village (Filings 27 and 28) to use Forest Park Drive 
              as an access to the Village.  The 
              developer has now submitted a revised proposal which DOES NOT include 
              the Forest Park connection. Instead, they will design the development 
              to eventually create a North Gate from Castle Pines Village that 
              would exit to the Legae Ranch (details of which are not yet worked 
              out) |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 11-00 |  | The 
            paving of Daniels Park Road |  | 
						
							|  |  | There 
              are no immediate plans to pave the length of Daniels Park Road. 
              Douglas county expects that some of the traffic currently using 
              Daniels Park Road will shift to Monarch-to-Quebec once that segment 
              is contructed and they will delay any plans for paving until the 
              need is determined and issues are resolved. The 
              northern-most mile or so of Daniels Park Road (near its current 
              intersection with Wildcat Reserve Parkway, just north of McArthur 
              Ranch Road) will end up being paved as homes are constructed in 
              that area. The road will be re-aligned so the access from the north 
              will be changed (once again). This is expected to happen in 2000. The 
              area between the south end of Highlands Ranch and the eventual north 
              end of CPN (near the power lines that cross the road) is a large 
              stretch of Open Space  there will never be homes or commercial 
              building, but there will be some public and recreational uses (such 
              as parks and schools). At some point, this section will probably 
              be paved. Just 
              south of the power lines, the Road goes through the park, crosses 
              Castle Pines Parkway and continues south to US 85. There are a number 
              of political, environmental, and engineering challenges associated 
              with any plans to pave this remaining section of the road.  
              Using Daniels Park RoadThe 
              County is planning on using road alignments and signage to discourage 
              use of the road through Daniels Park. Travelers coming from Highlands 
              Ranch would be guided toward the road through Romar West and travelers 
              coming north from US 85 would be guided toward Castle Pines Parkway.
 |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 10-00 |  | Workshops 
            to discuss access/road use for Castle Pines Village residential development |  | 
						
							|  |  | We 
              are going to hold two "workshops" to discuss the comments 
              that we will make on new developments near CPN (Filings 27 and 28 
              - aka the "Vickers Project"). This workshop concerns a 
              proposal for new homes in Castle Pines Village. The 
              County would require that emergency vehicles be able to get to the 
              homes in the northern section via the "service road" that 
              currently exists near Monarch and Oxford. this road is now used 
              by CPN Metro District trucks to get to the CPN Water Treatment Plant 
              and it is also on our plans to be a part of the community trail 
              system. (The CPN Metro District owns the road itself; there are 
              no plans for this road to be used for any type of regular traffic 
              and it is not an option for the "North Gate" access. In 
              our comments on this project, we will want to be very specific that 
              there would be adequate physical barriers so that traffic could 
              not circumvent the security gate for the Village and that there 
              would be very tight legal protections that this road would only 
              be used for authorized emergency vehicles. The 
              developer (Vickers) is now proposing that a preferred alternate 
              route for a "North Gate" would be via the Lagae Rance 
              (east of CPN), however, approval from the Legae Ranch owners is 
              not imminent and therefore the developer is asking:  
									to 
                proceed with the 400 homes in total in the entire section of Castle 
                Pines Village (zoning would allow 850)to 
                not build any North Gate at this time but to reserve space to 
                put in a future North Gate via the Legae Ranch. (This would obviate 
                access from Forest Park). There 
              are several issues with this proposal that could cause the Forest 
              Park route to bubble to the surface again. Also there are a variety 
              of other questions about this project, including water, wildlife 
              corridors, and schools. Attend the workship and particpate in our 
              feedback. |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 10-00 |  | Traffic 
            Lights in Castle Pines North |  | 
						
							|  |  | The 
              Castle Pines Parkway is the major east-west thoroughfare in our 
              community. One 
              ongoing community concern is high-speed traffic. Another 
              relates to traffic lights, which will be installed as traffic warrants, 
              most likely at Monarch Blvd. and near the new Village Square commercial 
              area. The County is monitoring traffic levels. Conversation 
              tied to the I-25 interchange and Castle Pines Parkway include improved 
              interchange lighting and the possible widening of the remaining 
              2 lane stretch of the Parkway to 4 lanes. |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 10-00 |  | Long 
            term plans for the I-25/US 85 corridors |  | 
						
							|  |  | A study 
              is underway to determine the longer-term improvements that should 
              be make in both the I-25 and Us 85 corridors. Options being considered 
              include more lanes (taking I-25 to 8 lanes total, and US 85 to 4 
              lanes total) and using rail or bus transit.  |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 10-00 |  | US 
            85 |  | 
						
							|  |  | Improving 
              the Titan Road intersection - This project constructs a grade-separated intersection between Titan 
              Road and the Burlington Northern Sante Fe Railroad. This project 
              is currently under conceptual design.
 |  | 
						
							|  |  | US 
            85/I-25 Interchange - This project removes the existing US 85/I-25 interchange ramps and 
            reroutes traffic through the improved Meadows/Founders/I-25 Interchange. 
            The existing overpass (exit ramp) is replaces with a grade-separated 
            crossing of US 85 connecting to Crowfoot Valley Road. This project 
            is currently being designed.
 |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 10-00 |  | I-25 
            Interchanges and overpasses |  | 
						
							|  |  |  Along 
              with the widening and reconstruction of I-25, there are also several 
              projects to modify interchanges and overpasses.  |  | 
						
							|  |  | Meadows/Founders 
            Parkway Interchange - This project improves the existing diamond interchange deficiencies 
            by constructing a partial cloverleaf interchange and is currently 
            under construction.
 |  | 
						
							|  |  | US 
            85/I-25 Interchange - This project removes the existing deficient US 85/I-25 Interchange 
            ramps and reroutes traffic through the improved Meadows/Founders/I-25 
            Interchange. The existing overpass (exit ramp) is replaced with a 
            grade-separated crossing of US 85 connecting to Crowfoot Valley Road. 
            This project is currently being designed.
 |  | 
						
							|  |  | Wolfensberger 
            Interchange - This project reconstructs the south half of Wolfensberger Road 
            bridges over I-25 and Plum Creek. This project is currently being 
            designed.
 |  | 
						
							|  |  | 5th 
            Street Overpass- This project improves the local Castle Rock transportation network 
            by providing an overpass from 5th Street on the eastside of I-25 to 
            Park Street on the west side of I-25. This project is currently being 
            designed. Businesses on the west side of I-25 want this overpass to 
            be built before the Wolfensberger interchange work begins so that 
            there will still be access to their properties.
 |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 9-00 |  | Phase 
            II of I-25 lane expansion |  | 
						
							|  |  | Phase 
            II of the Climbing Lanes project will extend the additional lanes 
            from Castle Pines Parkway south to the Meadows/Founders exit at the 
            north end of Castle Rock. Design of this project will be completed 
            by Spring of 2000. Construction funding was dependent on the outcome 
            of the Nov 99 election. The project is expected to begin Fall of 2000. |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 8-00 |  | Expanding 
            I-25 to 6 lanes, with "safety improvements" |  | 
						
							|  |  | The 
              biggest change is the expansion of I-25 from 2 lanes in each direction 
              (4 lanes total) to 3 lanes in each direction (6 lanes total) between 
              Lincoln and Castle Rock. Along with the expansion, the pavement 
              will be reconstructed for better traction in poor weather, and the 
              new highway will have wider shoulders to better handle emergency 
              stops. There will also be some type of sound mitigation barriers. CDOT 
              calls the additional lanes "climbing lanes" which will 
              allow slow moving vehicles (such as trucks) to negotiate the steep 
              grades on this section of I-25, and avoid the safety hazard of vehicles 
              moving at significantly different speeds. Despite the climbing lane 
              terminology, there will be no special design or restrictions on 
              use for the new lanes; all 6 lanes will be used as regular highway 
              lanes, with the expectation that slow-moving vehicles should be 
              using the right lane. |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  | 
						
							| 12-99 |  | I-25 
            and US 85 Approved Projects |  | 
						
							|  |  | Several 
              projects have already been approved by the Colorado Department of 
              Transportation (CDOT) to improve safety and provide some relief 
              to the congestion that we all experience on I-25 and US 85. These 
              projects are classified by CDOT as "Early Action Projects". 
              This is CDOT lingo that means that the projects are underway and 
              are in different stages of the process - ranging from construction, 
              to still being designed and awaiting approval for construction funding. The 
              projects were on the priority list for "early start" under 
              the funding approach approved by Referendum A in the November2, 
              1999 election. |  | 
						
							|  |  |  |  |  |