Tom
Anderson, outgoing Manager of the CPN Metro District and President
of the Parks Authority, gave a detailed report on the Parks Authority's
present and future endeavors, and discussed questions with Master
Association members and meeting guests.
Coyote Ridge Park is growing by the minute and will be ready to host the August 25 picnic, although several park amenities will not be completed until after the picnic. Park construction costs will come in under budget due to donations and cash-in-lieu services provided by DR Horton that far exceeds the cash payment that DR Horton was obligated to make.
Now that Coyote Ridge Park is getting off the ground, the Parks Authority is starting to look into the second park that had been in the Authority's plans, a "South Park" in the vicinity of the CPN Community Center. Several things are coming together that could make it feasible to pursue this park sooner than had been expected, including funds remaining from the construction budget for Coyote Ridge Park (since many items were donated), parks fees from new commercial development in the area (such as the Safeway), and the Metro District's contract to acquire 4.3 Acres to be dedicated as a condition of providing water and sewer service to the King Soopers development.
Anderson presented a concept-plan showing a possible layout of a new South Park, including ball fields, a play area, and possibly a recreation center. To avoid traffic impacts on surrounding neighborhoods, access would be provided at the new intersection on Castle Pines Parkway that will be built for the King Soopers, and a parking lot would be located in the center of the park area.
Anderson has begun research on the feasibility of building a recreation center with the amenities that received the greatest support in last year's community survey, including indoor pools (one oriented to adult swim, another oriented to kids, with a slide), weight and exercise rooms, and a running track. It may be possible to design the building to incorporate a climbing wall and doors to provide "open air" to the indoor swimming pool area. Anderson then provided a preliminary estimate of the costs and financing options for this type of recreation center. These numbers will need to be refined in the future. He has researched the cost of similar recreation centers built in the metro area. Construction costs could be financed by using a type of bond known as a "Certificate of Participation (COP)." Essentially, the "COP" would be a "mortgage," secured by the recreation center property. While it would require a committed revenue stream from homeowners to make the payments, this type of financing is NOT a General Obligation Bond that would put homeowners in the area personally at risk to pay the debt in the event of a default on the payments.
Anderson noted that the CPN Metro District's financial condition has improved, with tap fees and increased tax base due to the new homes and commercial development in the area. The Metro District is not allowed to use the increased income to finance a recreation center, however it would be possible that the Metro District's Board could reduce the taxes paid toward debt-service when they set the 2002 tax rates in December 2001 (perhaps in the range of $400 to $500 per year savings on a $300,000 home), then a portion of each homeowners' tax savings could be used to offset higher Master Association dues that would provide the revenue to pay off the COP. Anderson presented preliminary calculations that the recreation-center could be financed through raising Master HOA dues by $115 per year (to a total of $215 per year), with an additional "rec center membership" fee for those who wished to use the facility of perhaps $10-15 per month.
Metro District operating funds would also be used for the recreation center, so residents of Hidden Pointe, which is not in the Metro District boundary (and do not pay Metro District operating fund taxes), would follow their agreement with the Metro District, which requires that they pay 125% of any usage fees that are paid by Metro District taxpayers. Residents of areas that are outside of both the Master Association and the Metro District could purchase an "outside membership" for a higher fee, which would need to be determined. Discussion that much more information must be gathered before a final decision can be made whether to pursue construction of a recreation center, including more detailed plans and cost estimates for building the center, operating costs, and financing arrangements. Anderson stated that before the Parks Authority invests effort into pursuing these items, they need to know whether the Master Association supports the concept of a community recreation center, and is committed to raising Master Association dues to provide the revenue stream that is needed to obtain the COP funding. If the Master Association can provide the commitment in principle at the next meeting, and acts to raise dues effective for the 2002 calendar year, the Parks Authority can pursue the planning work that needs to be done, and a decision about construction could be made by spring/ early summer 2002.
Discussion that while the Master Association Bylaws allow the Board to assess higher dues, up to an amount that is adjusted for inflation each year (for 2002, it is expected to be approximately $215), and that additional dues can be approved by a vote of the Delegates. Discussion that any consideration of a dues increase could be made contingent on a variety of factors, such as the Metro District's taxes being lowered as discussed, and the additional dues could be refunded if there is no decision to build the center.
Several Master Association members stated that their conversations with neighbors have shown strong support for the concept of building a community recreation center; Nuzum noted that she had discussed the plan at the HOA2 meeting on Tuesday night and all in attendance supported it. Discussion that the Master Association's consideration of this topic should not be "rushed," that it should involve public notice and should be discussed at the Annual Meeting on November 8, 2001.
Master Association representatives were charged with going to their neighborhood associations to discuss the plan, and bring feedback to the next monthly meeting, where we will determine next steps.