Committees:
A. Development & Design Review:
Safeway Mitchell reported that Safeway's building permit may
be issued next month.
King Soopers Mitchell reported that the King Soopers is also proceeding through the final stages of county approval. The County Commission hearing is set for August 8th at 1 p.m. As part of the agreement to provide water and sewer service to this development, the Metro District has negotiated with the owners to obtain 4.3 acres of land on the north side of Castle Pines Parkway for a future park site. This land is currently zoned commercial, and the owners wish to transfer the commercial zoning. Transfer of zoning is a very difficult process, as they have to go through a master plan amendment.
BP Amoco - (SP00-012, comments due ASAP) Nuzum reported that the BP Amoco is continuing through the planning process. The developer has submitted a revised architectural design. Master Association members felt that the revised design is a huge improvement to the original plan, and supported the County's comments related to the improved landscape plan including the berm, the need to isolate the light and noise to the site, and to limit the car wash hours. We will receive another Referral when the developer will submit a complete revised plan.
Apartments Mitchell reported that the new owner of the apartment complex, Trammel Crowe, is submitting revisions to the pool/clubhouse and minor architectural changes; we will receive a Referral to comment on the revised plans. The number of apartments in the complex will remain unchanged (357).
CPV - Summit area Mitchell reported that CPV Filing 15C received final County approval at the end of June, and that the area immediately south of Forest Park, Filing 15D, is on hold and is not expected to be sent for referral and hearings until at least September - November. This area will be important because this will be the Filing that documents that the North gate will not be built. We have received a copy of the draft plan to manage the construction traffic for the Summit development; Nuzum will forward this again to members who did not receive the first email.
RidgeGate (Lone Tree) Mitchell reported that she had attended a meeting about future development in the new area of Lone Tree called Ridge Gate (formerly known as Rampart Range), located south of Lincoln along both sides of I-25. The site will house the new hospital, which is breaking ground at the end of the month. A large rec center may also be built. Long-range plans for the area include a high-density office/residential "urban center", a total of 10,000 homes, 1,000 acres of open space, and a new I-25 interchange called Ridge Gate Road about 1 mile south of Lincoln. The development would be built over a 40 to 50 year period.
Buffalo Ridge - (Pool - SP01-048, comments due 8/9/01 SIP review of neighborhood pool). Master Association members had no comment, and referred this to the Development/ Design Review Committee.
CPN PD 10th Amendment - (Filing 27 setbacks - SP01-048, comments due 7/17/01) Administrative Amendment to CPN PD, to modify the Design Guidelines to change the setback for lots with side-loaded garages, for Tapadero. Master Association members had no comment, and referred this to the Development/ Design Review Committee. Romar West 1st Amendment - Replat/Road - ZR01-010, comments due 7/17/01 Administrative amendment to Romar PD to modify the intersection of Griggs Road and Daniels Gate Road to accommodate a "roundabout" and other changes related to installing a gate to the neighborhood west of this intersection. Item referred to Development/ Design Review Committee with the following comments from Master Association members: No objections to the proposed changes; but we note that there have been issues come up with prospective homeowners regarding the need for additional disclosure that the existing PD/Plat reserves space to continue Griggs Road south to Daniels Park, as requested by Douglas County (in the event that there is a future decision to re-route Daniels Park Road to this location). The Master Association will ask that additional disclosures be made, in Marketing materials from the builders, through having prospective homeowners need sign a contract saying they are aware of a potential road, and through signage at the potential road location. We would not support paving of this stretch of the road simply as a means of public disclosure; paving should occur only if a decision is made to re-align Daniels Park Road. Discussion of whether this alignment would ever be used will occur when the future of Daniels Park Road is decided.