The Castle Pines North Homeowners Association online Home Page Help finding information on this web site CPNHOA Site Map
The Castle Pines North Homeowners Association  online Home Page
 
CPNHOA Home Page The CPN Quick News page Open commentary from the Master Association The page you are on
 
 
 
  ARCHIVES  
Go to Main Menu for Forum Topics  

 

 

Archive for 2001 : Life in CPN re: Rec Center  
11-15 a Claremont resident chimes in:  
  "All it takes for legitimate questions and issues to get lost in the shuffle is to engage in sniping over tone and personality. I have attended the meeting, read the comments and have heard questions raised that deserve attention. I think it would be prudent to focus on the lack of answers to date to all the questions that have been brought up and not faction ourselves unnecessarily."  
     
11-14 a resident of CPN responds:  
  "To the Bristle Cone resident who responds about the "ill-informed and rude, and puerile behavior of those in HOA #1". Just one response to you. You mentioned, "Being in a democracy, one must endure the intelligent as well as all others." If we are in a democracy, why can't the question of a rec. center be put to a vote and let the "intelligent" decide?"  
     
11-13 Galen, a resident of CPN comments:  
 

"I was very disappointed that the annual meeting agenda did not provide a section for homeowner input. I was under the impression from the last newsletter that homeowner input would be sought at the annual meeting. Was I wrong? I still have several unanswered questions regarding the proposed rec center. I would appreciate answers from anyone who can answer them!

Some of my questions are as follows:

1. What are the anticipated operational cost of the proposed rec center?

2. How much money will the Metro District be contributing for their operational budget?

3. Will there be a limit set on the number of non-resident users?

4. What is the anticipated amount of money needed to service the interest on the bond and how is that revenue to be obtained?

5. When can we expect the bond to be paid off?

6. Does the parks authority have enough money to fund a feasibility and financial anaylsis? The Castle Pines Master Association, The Parks Authority, and the Metro District are all involved in the planning of the proposed Rec. Center.

7. My question is why does the Park Authority have the final say on whether the move ahead on the Rec. Center?

8. What recourse does the taxpayer and the homeower have when an appointed board has the final decision to commit someone (unknown) to a several million dollar bond?

9. What is wrong with submitting the question about a proposed Rec. Center to homeowners for a vote?

Anyone who can answer my questions can respond to me at arcgrc@aol.com Thanks for listening! Galen R. Crowder

 
 
If answers are available, please also share them with the webmaster who will in turn, make them available to the community through a posting on this forum.
 
11-11 a BristleCone resident responds:  
  "Concerning the ill-informed, rude, and puerile behavior of those in HOA-1 and Bristol Cone against the feasibility study for a recreation center, which was evident by those in attendance at the last Master Association MEeting as well as November 8th Annual CPN meeting, we would like to assure those residents in CPN that these people have an agenda that has absolutely nothing to do with a recreation center, and everything to do with their ridiculous grievances against past members of the Metro District. While many of you had your eyes opened at the annual meeting as to the sad and pathetic efforts to push their agenda on others, be assured that the reasonable citizens of CPN who want the best for their community will voice their opinion when asked to do so. Being a democracy, one must endure the intelligent as well as all others."  
     
10-31 This was sent in:  
 

"Due to an enormous amount of differing opinions on the subject of raising the Master Association dues for a Rec Center, several CPN residents have formed a petition asking the Master Association Board to hold off on any vote to increase our dues until a full feasibility study is performed. Once the exact figures are determined and communicated to the public, then a vote or poll of Castle Pines North residents can be done. If you'd like to add your name to the petition logon to: http://www.petitiononline.com/NOTO115/petition.html

This petition is not intended to delay or halt the construction of an indoor neighborhood Rec Center, but only to ask the Master Board members to not vote to increase any dues, until a full disclosure of the cost of building, maintaining and funding a Rec Center is communicated to the public.

This petition is sponsored by the residents of Castle Pines North and not affiliated with this web site or any HOA or Master Board member organizations."

 
     
10-30 a resident adds:  
  "The Rec Center is Tom Anderson's idea (former Metro District President). He sent out the surveys and tallied the votes. Don't be fooled. The 115% increase in Master Association dues has nothing to do with building a rec center. It has everything to do with keeping our tax dollars away from us and in the hands of the Metro District."  
     
10-21 Dan from KnightsBridge comments:  
 

"I just received the Fall 2001 Master Association "Connection" and was stunned to see the article titled "Is CPN Ready for a Recreation Center?" This is the first our family has heard of this and we are quite concerned! We immediately spoke with our community representative to the Master Association and this is what she said:

1. This project was proposed by Tom Anderson (past President of the Metro District)and is his "pet project".

2. The increase in assessments which the Board will be discussing at the November 8, 2001 meeting is the maximum, by law, that they can raise our fees in a single year - it is by no means indicative of what each homeowner's financial responsibility will be to actually build the facility.

3. The "overwhelming majority" of homeowners haven't even responded - contrary to the article in "Connection". The fact? - Only 200 responses were provided during a survey conducted sometime last year. Of the 200, 75% showed support. The survey was taken by Tom Anderson and his wife counted the votes and provided the Master Association with the results.

4. Tom Anderson was asked by our representative to provide the Board with a Business Plan - he refused!

5. There is a large number of homeowner's who've expressed concern over this and live in HOA #1 and Bristlecone - Patio. The representatives to the Master Association have expressed concern on behalf of these homeowner's and the other Board members have "brushed them aside".

Our family's concerns are these:

1. Castle Pines North residents pay the highest property taxes in the state of Colorado because of our Special Assessment by the Metro District(over 14%). For comparison, Highland's Ranch residents pay around 9%. Source: Douglas County Assessor's Website.

2. Assessing each homeowner $115 - $450 per year because "the Metro District's PROPOSED 2002 budget reflects a significant cut in the mill levy for 2002" is a crime. Just when many of us were looking forward to lessening our financial burden from the Metro District Assessment, the Master Association has found a way to absorb our tax relief! In addition, according to the Douglas County Assessor's office, our property taxes in 2002 are scheduled for an increase at the County level.

3. Homeowners in the neighborhood I live in can't even afford to water their lawn, paint their house and pay for the necessary maintenance required by our covenants. Take a drive around your own neighborhood and take a good look at how your neighbors (you?) are keeping up with routine maintenance.

4. According to an Assessor at Douglas County, home prices in this area are considered "Stable". Not increasing (as we would have hoped) or decreasing, but stable. We asked the reason for this and his statement was quite clear: Two reasons: homes go unmaintained and CPN is too expensive. According to him, until we can realize some tax relief from the Metro District Assessment, our community will not realize the kind of increases in home value that other Douglas County communities enjoy. On this point, we recently paid for an appraisal of our home by an independent appraisor. What we were told by the Assessor at the County held true for our home's appraisal. The gentleman we hired made the same comments on our appraisal, so this is something widely held amongst certified appraisor's in the state of Colorado. We then spoke to a few Real Estate agents that specialize in our area. They confirmed for us that there are interested buyers for our properties that turn away when they realize what the financial commitment is to live in CPN.

5. "Feasability Studies" aren't free. What concerns us is just good common sense - the recreation center in Castle Rock is never "at capacity" when my family has chosen to use it. So our little community thinks that we will somehow be able to build and financially maintain a recreation facility? To us, it's not even worth the cost of the feasability study to find out that we can't, or worse yet, to find out in five years (after it's been built) that this little community can't.

A recreation center is a luxury. Our family is already feeling the effects of a recession. My company is considering layoffs. Our home doesn't appraise for what it could and that's strictly because of the place we chose to call home - CPN.

We knew when we moved here in 1996 that we would be paying a higher price to live here. We thought it would be worth it. We've become increasingly concerned over how this area is managed by our homeowner's association, the Master Association and the Metro District. For those of you that think "our fees to live here are cheaper than Highland's Ranch" - think again. In fact, do the math for your own home - how much are you spending for HOA dues, Master Association dues, Metro District Assessments, Metro District water, IREA charges, increased phone charges from Qwest etc.?

Please just consider these things and attend the meeting on November 8. I only hope that the Board members will take a hard look at these basic issues before they choose to assess this fee.

Unfortunately for us, if this fee is assessed, we've decided it's time to leave this area and call someplace else home.

One final thought: Highland's Ranch homeowner's were able to vote on Recreation Center needs on a November ballot. Each homeowner's voice was heard. The recreation centers in Highlands Ranch were built because local communities didn't have clubhouse, pool and tennis court facilities."

 
     
10-1 Jim from KnightsBridge sends this in re: CPN rec center proposal  
 

Say NO the Highlands "Ranchification" of Castle Pines North by saying NO TO A REC CENTER. Building a Rec Center in our Community is the absolute worst idea that the Master Association is pushing on us.

Having worked several years at the NorthRidge Center in Highlands Ranch, I'd like to dispel some of the myths of the advantages of a Rec Center.

Myth #1: Young children can participate in structured activities. Reality #1: Many parents will treat the Center as free babysitting where they can "dump" off their kids for a few hours. It is not daycare. The state-required ratios and certified caregiver rules do not apply. Many parents are even more afraid to bring young children to the Center for fear of the foul language and negative influences of the teens that are allowed to roam unsupervised.

Myth #2: Positive place for teens to congregate.
Reality #2: We will give the teens a great place to discover smoking, drinking and experiment with sex, not too mention learn how to fight, discover new swear words and practice their "CPN Sucks" writing skills on the Recreation walls.

Myth #3: It will be great to have a tennis, racquetball and basketball facilities at our disposal in close proximity.
Reality 3#: We have tennis and basketball courts now and they are seldom used. Racquetball is an outdated 1970's sport that even local high-end health clubs are removing. Tennis lessons and basketball leagues will be extra costs anyway. Go to Castle Rock or join a real health club.

Myth #4: Having a Rec Center will increase our property value.
Reality #4: Would you like to have your property to border the Rec Center's? There will be an increase of graffiti, increase in car traffic, increase of noise past 10:00pm, as well as a prime meeting place for illegal gang activity. You can look up all the Highlands Ranch arrests and see that the majority of illegal activity takes places at or near the 2 Rec Centers.

Myth #5: Using the state-of-the-art equipment will be great. Reality #5: The state of the art equipment is at Colorado Athletic Club or 24Hour Fitness. A community rec center cannot afford high end equipment. If they can, it will definitely be passed onto ALL residents in their dues. The real athletic clubs also pay for maintenance and replacement of old machines. Rec Centers continues to repair a damaged piece until it is considered obsolete. As for free weights, forget about it, the insurance cost associated with free weights is too high. It is not cost effective to have free weights. The percentage of CPN residents that will actually use the exercise equipment on a regular basis will be less than 2%. But again, all residents will pay for this.

Myth #6: Building a Rec Center is a good use of commercial space.
Reality #6: With a cash cow like a Rec Center in the area, businesses will chomp at the bit to get their business nearby. Is a Cigarette King soon to follow?

I implore the residents of CPN to demand that our dollars do not go into building a Recreation Center.

 
  Rebuttal received and posted below:  
10-9 A BriarCliff resident responds to the above comment:  
 

"QUIT YOUR WHINING!!! To all the people that are whining about the rec center, you need to remember one thing - you live in a democratic society where majority wins. It is apparent that when things that don't go your way, you need to start making claims that are completely unfounded. Let's start with claims of crime and gang activity - please cite your specific source. As for people that don't want an increase in dues, based on the formula spelled out in the initial founding documents of CPN, you should be paying that much already - still cheaper to live here in a nicer area than it is to live in the Ranch. Do you really think that a state-of-the-art rec facility would lower property values? Cite specific sources where this has happened.

We have NOTHING in Castle Pines North that would be considered a community center - a place where neighbors can come meet and play. So instead of hiding behind an anonymous internet posting, I challenge you to bring your complaints (and specific, verifiable data) to the annual meeting on November 8, 2001, and voice them there. I promise you that your opinions will be heard, and likely challenged by other residents. To those of you supporting the rec center - be sure to attend the meeting to make sure that your voice is heard as well."

 
 
The whole purpose of this forum is to communicate with each other. All points-of-view are represented. Talk, share, care - this is our patch of the world and we are responsible to it and to each other.
 
top of page  
  Archive for 2001 : Life in CPN re: General Commentary (most recent first)  
12-18 a Canterbury resident sends in:  
 

"Can anyone tell me where the last HOA meeting was on 11/29, the newsletter said it would be at the clubhouse on Yorkshire, no one there?

I'm curious what the next steps are for this clubhouse, there are clear concerns being communicated to the representatives of the communities in CPN and what are the plans?

I am further concerned as there are no minutes to report, what all is going on?"

 
 

Tell you what I know, but it is not much. There was a meeting on Nov. 29th at the Community Center (the building off Yorkshire and CP Parkway). This was the monthly meeting of the Master Association that began at 7:00 pm. Minutes are not released until they are approved. What has been approved is online.

 
11-14 From Castle Pines Coffee Cravings  
  "I believe that the correct usage on the CPN marketplace page is "Whom to hire" rather than "who". Too many years with nuns and rulers I guess, to let it go. Thanks"  
 

Webmaster is standing by the colloquial use of the wording, using "Who" until there is a window of time as this is a 2-3 hour fix.

 
     
10-31 A BristleCone resident comments:  
  "I would like to make a comment with regard to the Master's Association meetings which we are always being "encouraged" to attend. I recently attended the October meeting. I was appalled at the level of un-professionalism exhibited by the board members. For starters: we were told that our comments would only be heard for 30 minutes. During that time, we were constantly interrupted by the board trying to interject their views and biased opinions. I am sure they never heard a word that was said, since they had their own agendas. Some of the female members of the board were so blatant in looking at the sign-in sheet to see who was making a comment which was contrary to their beliefs and rolling their eyes like a bunch of high school girls. It was disgusting to witness. I would like to think we are in a democracy, but the truth of the matter is that our community is in the hands of a few incompetents who are more interested in how their resumes read than in looking out for the good of this community. I encourage more people of our community to attend these meetings. I do not trust this board to be working in our best interests."  
     
10-26 A 16-yr CPN resident from Claremont sends in:  
  A REQUEST: That we all become more informed as to how our Metro District, Master Association and Parks Authority operate. I've read comments in this forum and heard second-hand comments from neighbors that indicate we, the homeowners, are not being provided adequate and timely information from those that we have elected to represent us. I would suggest to each of the above Boards that they take advantage of this outstanding web site and post the agenda for each meeting and post the Minutes of said meetings. This would allow those that are interested to participate when an issue is important to them. The elected officials should remember that they are responsible to the voters every day not just prior to an annual meeting or election.  
     
10-8 Joe from KnightsBridge comments:  
  "I have heard talk that there are plans to extend Monarch through to the commercial developments along I-25. I urge all residents of CPN to fight this plan. Do you really want another major route through our community? Especially one that passes by our Elementary School. If you hear of any plans please work to oppose them. And if you hear of it, get this information out so we may all join you. Stop turning CPN into Highlands Ranch."  
  Anybody know more about this particular topic? Please add your comments.  
9-3 a CPN resident sends this:  
  "I think there is, not a clash, but a distinction of cultures out here. There is the group that came here when it really was out on the edges of nothing much (and that was a good part of the appeal to living here) and the group that came after the bond was settled and building was on the upswing. Many of the reasons for the first group's decision to come live here are disappearing under the weight of the second group (truly, no offense is meant) who seem to have differing expectations and wants. Just a thought."  
     
8-29 a CPN resident shares:  
 

"We have lived here since 1986. It is a great place to live and raise children. We love our home, neighborhood, friends, school etc. The grocery store (one) will be great for obvious reasons.

But, since the recent growth, (the past 3 years) we feel the area is becoming more like Highlands Ranch and less like the area we chose to move to. If we could make the decision again as to where to move to, I doubt we would choose this area.

However, all of the Denver area has changed in character... More pressure should be put on the builders, the planning and zoning and the commissioners to make the lots larger. The density is too much. (I know the standard response is the bond issue.) The pressure cannot come from a few hysterical homeowners, but it must be a strong voice like the Master Assoc.

What happened in Forest Park is a sin, especially the lots owned by Ashcroft. The greed of the builders and developers will eventually backfire - water issues, crime issues, lack of a sense of community for everyone will all add up and create problems so that the special quality of CPN will be lost forever.

It really is a shame, because it could have been an area where less might be best & not an extension of the sea of rooftops of Highlands Ranch.

Also, not to be thoroughly negative...there was a recent bit of crime in HOA1. I think everyone in the area should know what happened (accurately from the police) so people can be more cautious and alert. We are not immune to crime and as the area grows more incidents will occur. That's my opinion!!"

 
     
8-27 a CPN resident from Kings Crossing writes in:  
  "So long, Pikes Peak... One of the pleasures of returning home from points north has always been gazing at Pikes Peak from the top of our exit ramp, just before turning west onto CPN Parkway. It was always fun to watch the snows come and go on this majestic mountain during the years. Well, I want a grocery store as much as the next person, but I'm so sad to see the wall of Safeway (or one of its neighbors) rising directly in front of this very special view. Progress..(sigh)"  
     
7-25 a CPN resident from StoneCroft writes in:  
  "With the opening of the Monarch extension to Quebec the amount of traffic has increased tremendously. Has the home owners assocation discussed planting more trees along the west side of Monarch from Stonemont Dr. north? This could create more of a sound barrier for traffic noise."  
     
7-22 KnightsBridge resident Jan Killough-Wilhem comments:  
 

"We have lived in Castle Pines North for 2 months and I am surprised at all the complaints people have! If people are so unhappy about the deer and rabbits. Why in the world did they move here..."Get a Life"...Go live in Denver...We are tired of hearing and reading about your inadequacies of not being able to cope with nature! Contact Coldwell Bankers. You complainers are much more of a nuisance to Castle Pines and all of society than any wildlife that resides here!"

 
  Anybody up for a response in kind or another point-of-view? Share your thoughts...  
  top of page    
 

Articles are dated:
For general commentary, the most recent comment is first up.
In threaded conversations, comments follow in chronological order.

Comments appearing here are unedited and reflect the views of the commentator. We offer them in the spirit of community voice.

Add yours.

   
       
     
 
The Castle Pines North HOA Home pageDirectory of contacts for the CPN communitySite OverviewHelp finding information#top
    
 OUR COMMUNITY . .Calendar Events Kids Activities Maps Neighborhoods Outreach Recreation Schools  
 FEATURES . . . . . . . . Bidathon CPN Asks Surveys Finding Food Gardening Golfing Pets Share Spotlight Wildlife  
 ORGANIZATIONS . .County HOA - Master Assoc HOA - Neighborhoods Metro District Parks Authority  
 NEWS & ISSUES . . .Comments Commercial Internet Quick News Recreation Residential Forum Roads Schools  
 OUR SERVICES . . . .Contacts Covenants Email Alerts Move to CPN New to CPN Newsletter Website 
 MARKET PLACE . . . . Directory Business Partners Classifieds Restaurants Submittal Form Swap Who to Hire 
    
 

Castle Pines North Homeowners Association
Copyright © 2001-2002 Castle Pines North Homeowners Association
All rights reserved.

Telephone and Fax:
303-482-3078

Address:
CPN Association, Inc.
7402 Yorkshire Drive
Castle Rock, Colorado 80104

Contact the Castle Pines North Homeowners Association (CPNHOA) by e-mail.

 

www.CPNHOA.org

About this Web site:

Please contact our Webmaster by e-mail for any problems with this Web site. Thank you.

  Site Design by BG&N, Inc.