|
Go
to Main Menu for Forum Topics |
|
|
|
Archive
for 2001 : Life in CPN re:
Rec Center |
|
11-15 |
a
Claremont resident chimes in: |
|
|
"All
it takes for legitimate questions and issues to get lost in the shuffle
is to engage in sniping over tone and personality. I have attended
the meeting, read the comments and have heard questions raised that
deserve attention. I think it would be prudent to focus on the lack
of answers to date to all the questions that have been brought up
and not faction ourselves unnecessarily." |
|
|
|
|
11-14 |
a
resident of CPN responds: |
|
|
"To
the Bristle Cone resident who responds about the "ill-informed and
rude, and puerile behavior of those in HOA #1". Just one response
to you. You mentioned, "Being in a democracy, one must endure the
intelligent as well as all others." If we are in a democracy, why
can't the question of a rec. center be put to a vote and let the "intelligent"
decide?" |
|
|
|
|
11-13 |
Galen,
a resident of CPN comments: |
|
|
"I
was very disappointed that the annual meeting agenda did not provide
a section for homeowner input. I was under the impression from the
last newsletter that homeowner input would be sought at the annual
meeting. Was I wrong? I still have several unanswered questions
regarding the proposed rec center. I would appreciate answers
from anyone who can answer them!
Some
of my questions are as follows:
1.
What are the anticipated operational cost of the proposed rec center?
2.
How much money will the Metro District be contributing for their
operational budget?
3.
Will there be a limit set on the number of non-resident users?
4.
What is the anticipated amount of money needed to service the interest
on the bond and how is that revenue to be obtained?
5.
When can we expect the bond to be paid off?
6.
Does the parks authority have enough money to fund a feasibility
and financial anaylsis? The Castle Pines Master Association, The
Parks Authority, and the Metro District are all involved in the
planning of the proposed Rec. Center.
7.
My question is why does the Park Authority have the final say on
whether the move ahead on the Rec. Center?
8.
What recourse does the taxpayer and the homeower have when an appointed
board has the final decision to commit someone (unknown) to a several
million dollar bond?
9.
What is wrong with submitting the question about a proposed Rec.
Center to homeowners for a vote?
Anyone
who can answer my questions can respond to me at arcgrc@aol.com
Thanks for listening! Galen R. Crowder
|
|
|
 |
If
answers are available, please also share them with the
webmaster who will in turn, make them available to the community
through a posting on this forum. |
|
|
11-11 |
a
BristleCone resident responds: |
|
|
"Concerning
the ill-informed, rude, and puerile behavior of those in HOA-1 and
Bristol Cone against the feasibility study for a recreation center,
which was evident by those in attendance at the last Master Association
MEeting as well as November 8th Annual CPN meeting, we would like
to assure those residents in CPN that these people have an agenda
that has absolutely nothing to do with a recreation center, and everything
to do with their ridiculous grievances against past members of the
Metro District. While many of you had your eyes opened at the annual
meeting as to the sad and pathetic efforts to push their agenda on
others, be assured that the reasonable citizens of CPN who want the
best for their community will voice their opinion when asked to do
so. Being a democracy, one must endure the intelligent as well as
all others." |
|
|
|
|
10-31 |
This
was sent in: |
|
|
"Due
to an enormous amount of differing opinions on the subject of raising
the Master Association dues for a Rec Center, several CPN residents
have formed a petition asking the Master Association Board to hold
off on any vote to increase our dues until a full feasibility study
is performed. Once the exact figures are determined and communicated
to the public, then a vote or poll of Castle Pines North residents
can be done. If you'd like to add your name to the petition logon
to: http://www.petitiononline.com/NOTO115/petition.html
This
petition is not intended to delay or halt the construction of an
indoor neighborhood Rec Center, but only to ask the Master Board
members to not vote to increase any dues, until a full disclosure
of the cost of building, maintaining and funding a Rec Center is
communicated to the public.
This
petition is sponsored by the residents of Castle Pines North and
not affiliated with this web site or any HOA or Master Board member
organizations."
|
|
|
|
|
10-30 |
a
resident adds: |
|
|
"The
Rec Center is Tom Anderson's idea (former Metro District President).
He sent out the surveys and tallied the votes. Don't be fooled. The
115% increase in Master Association dues has nothing to do with building
a rec center. It has everything to do with keeping our tax dollars
away from us and in the hands of the Metro District." |
|
|
|
|
10-21 |
Dan
from KnightsBridge comments: |
|
|
"I
just received the Fall 2001 Master Association "Connection" and
was stunned to see the article titled "Is CPN Ready for a Recreation
Center?" This is the first our family has heard of this and we are
quite concerned! We immediately spoke with our community representative
to the Master Association and this is what she said:
1.
This project was proposed by Tom Anderson (past President of the
Metro District)and is his "pet project".
2.
The increase in assessments which the Board will be discussing at
the November 8, 2001 meeting is the maximum, by law, that they can
raise our fees in a single year - it is by no means indicative of
what each homeowner's financial responsibility will be to actually
build the facility.
3.
The "overwhelming majority" of homeowners haven't even responded
- contrary to the article in "Connection". The fact? - Only 200
responses were provided during a survey conducted sometime last
year. Of the 200, 75% showed support. The survey was taken by Tom
Anderson and his wife counted the votes and provided the Master
Association with the results.
4.
Tom Anderson was asked by our representative to provide the Board
with a Business Plan - he refused!
5.
There is a large number of homeowner's who've expressed concern
over this and live in HOA #1 and Bristlecone - Patio. The representatives
to the Master Association have expressed concern on behalf of these
homeowner's and the other Board members have "brushed them aside".
Our
family's concerns are these:
1.
Castle Pines North residents pay the highest property taxes in the
state of Colorado because of our Special Assessment by the Metro
District(over 14%). For comparison, Highland's Ranch residents pay
around 9%. Source: Douglas County Assessor's Website.
2.
Assessing each homeowner $115 - $450 per year because "the Metro
District's PROPOSED 2002 budget reflects a significant cut in the
mill levy for 2002" is a crime. Just when many of us were looking
forward to lessening our financial burden from the Metro District
Assessment, the Master Association has found a way to absorb our
tax relief! In addition, according to the Douglas County Assessor's
office, our property taxes in 2002 are scheduled for an increase
at the County level.
3.
Homeowners in the neighborhood I live in can't even afford to water
their lawn, paint their house and pay for the necessary maintenance
required by our covenants. Take a drive around your own neighborhood
and take a good look at how your neighbors (you?) are keeping up
with routine maintenance.
4.
According to an Assessor at Douglas County, home prices in this
area are considered "Stable". Not increasing (as we would have hoped)
or decreasing, but stable. We asked the reason for this and his
statement was quite clear: Two reasons: homes go unmaintained and
CPN is too expensive. According to him, until we can realize some
tax relief from the Metro District Assessment, our community will
not realize the kind of increases in home value that other Douglas
County communities enjoy. On this point, we recently paid for an
appraisal of our home by an independent appraisor. What we were
told by the Assessor at the County held true for our home's appraisal.
The gentleman we hired made the same comments on our appraisal,
so this is something widely held amongst certified appraisor's in
the state of Colorado. We then spoke to a few Real Estate agents
that specialize in our area. They confirmed for us that there are
interested buyers for our properties that turn away when they realize
what the financial commitment is to live in CPN.
5.
"Feasability Studies" aren't free. What concerns us is just good
common sense - the recreation center in Castle Rock is never "at
capacity" when my family has chosen to use it. So our little community
thinks that we will somehow be able to build and financially maintain
a recreation facility? To us, it's not even worth the cost of the
feasability study to find out that we can't, or worse yet, to find
out in five years (after it's been built) that this little community
can't.
A recreation
center is a luxury. Our family is already feeling the effects of
a recession. My company is considering layoffs. Our home doesn't
appraise for what it could and that's strictly because of the place
we chose to call home - CPN.
We
knew when we moved here in 1996 that we would be paying a higher
price to live here. We thought it would be worth it. We've become
increasingly concerned over how this area is managed by our homeowner's
association, the Master Association and the Metro District. For
those of you that think "our fees to live here are cheaper than
Highland's Ranch" - think again. In fact, do the math for your own
home - how much are you spending for HOA dues, Master Association
dues, Metro District Assessments, Metro District water, IREA charges,
increased phone charges from Qwest etc.?
Please
just consider these things and attend the meeting on November 8.
I only hope that the Board members will take a hard look at these
basic issues before they choose to assess this fee.
Unfortunately
for us, if this fee is assessed, we've decided it's time to leave
this area and call someplace else home.
One
final thought: Highland's Ranch homeowner's were able to vote
on Recreation Center needs on a November ballot. Each homeowner's
voice was heard. The recreation centers in Highlands Ranch were
built because local communities didn't have clubhouse, pool and
tennis court facilities."
|
|
|
|
|
10-1 |
Jim
from KnightsBridge sends this in re: CPN rec center proposal |
|
|
Say
NO the Highlands "Ranchification" of Castle Pines North
by saying NO TO A REC CENTER. Building a Rec Center in our Community
is the absolute worst idea that the Master Association is pushing
on us.
Having
worked several years at the NorthRidge Center in Highlands Ranch,
I'd like to dispel some of the myths of the advantages of a Rec
Center.
Myth
#1: Young children can participate in structured activities.
Reality #1: Many parents will treat the Center as free babysitting
where they can "dump" off their kids for a few hours.
It is not daycare. The state-required ratios and certified caregiver
rules do not apply. Many parents are even more afraid to bring young
children to the Center for fear of the foul language and negative
influences of the teens that are allowed to roam unsupervised.
Myth
#2: Positive place for teens to congregate.
Reality #2: We will give the teens a great place to discover
smoking, drinking and experiment with sex, not too mention learn
how to fight, discover new swear words and practice their "CPN
Sucks" writing skills on the Recreation walls.
Myth
#3: It will be great to have a tennis, racquetball and basketball
facilities at our disposal in close proximity.
Reality 3#: We have tennis and basketball courts now and
they are seldom used. Racquetball is an outdated 1970's sport that
even local high-end health clubs are removing. Tennis lessons and
basketball leagues will be extra costs anyway. Go to Castle Rock
or join a real health club.
Myth
#4: Having a Rec Center will increase our property value.
Reality #4: Would you like to have your property to border
the Rec Center's? There will be an increase of graffiti, increase
in car traffic, increase of noise past 10:00pm, as well as a prime
meeting place for illegal gang activity. You can look up all the
Highlands Ranch arrests and see that the majority of illegal activity
takes places at or near the 2 Rec Centers.
Myth
#5: Using the state-of-the-art equipment will be great. Reality
#5: The state of the art equipment is at Colorado Athletic Club
or 24Hour Fitness. A community rec center cannot afford high end
equipment. If they can, it will definitely be passed onto ALL residents
in their dues. The real athletic clubs also pay for maintenance
and replacement of old machines. Rec Centers continues to repair
a damaged piece until it is considered obsolete. As for free weights,
forget about it, the insurance cost associated with free weights
is too high. It is not cost effective to have free weights. The
percentage of CPN residents that will actually use the exercise
equipment on a regular basis will be less than 2%. But again, all
residents will pay for this.
Myth
#6: Building a Rec Center is a good use of commercial space.
Reality #6: With a cash cow like a Rec Center in the area,
businesses will chomp at the bit to get their business nearby. Is
a Cigarette King soon to follow?
I
implore the residents of CPN to demand that our dollars do not go
into building a Recreation Center.
|
|
|
Rebuttal
received and posted below: |
|
10-9 |
A
BriarCliff resident responds to the above comment: |
|
|
"QUIT
YOUR WHINING!!! To all the people that are whining about the rec
center, you need to remember one thing - you live in a democratic
society where majority wins. It is apparent that when things that
don't go your way, you need to start making claims that are completely
unfounded. Let's start with claims of crime and gang activity -
please cite your specific source. As for people that don't want
an increase in dues, based on the formula spelled out in the initial
founding documents of CPN, you should be paying that much already
- still cheaper to live here in a nicer area than it is to live
in the Ranch. Do you really think that a state-of-the-art rec facility
would lower property values? Cite specific sources where this has
happened.
We
have NOTHING in Castle Pines North that would be considered a community
center - a place where neighbors can come meet and play. So instead
of hiding behind an anonymous internet posting, I challenge you
to bring your complaints (and specific, verifiable data) to the
annual meeting on November 8, 2001, and voice them there. I promise
you that your opinions will be heard, and likely challenged by other
residents. To those of you supporting the rec center - be sure to
attend the meeting to make sure that your voice is heard as well."
|
|
|
 |
The
whole purpose of this forum is to communicate with each other.
All points-of-view are represented. Talk, share, care - this
is our patch of the world and we are responsible to it and to
each other. |
|
|
|
top
of page |
|
|
Archive
for 2001 : Life in CPN re:
General Commentary (most recent first) |
|
12-18 |
a
Canterbury resident sends in: |
|
|
"Can
anyone tell me where the last HOA meeting was on 11/29, the newsletter
said it would be at the clubhouse on Yorkshire, no one there?
I'm
curious what the next steps are for this clubhouse, there are clear
concerns being communicated to the representatives of the communities
in CPN and what are the plans?
I am
further concerned as there are no minutes to report, what all is
going on?"
|
|
|
 |
Tell
you what I know, but it is not much. There was a meeting on
Nov. 29th at the Community Center (the building off Yorkshire
and CP Parkway). This was the monthly meeting of the Master
Association that began at 7:00 pm. Minutes are not released
until they are approved. What has been approved is online.
|
|
|
11-14 |
From
Castle Pines Coffee Cravings |
|
|
"I
believe that the correct usage on the CPN marketplace page is "Whom
to hire" rather than "who". Too many years with nuns and rulers I
guess, to let it go. Thanks" |
|
|
 |
Webmaster
is standing by the colloquial use of the wording, using "Who"
until there is a window of time as this is a 2-3 hour fix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-31 |
A
BristleCone resident comments: |
|
|
"I
would like to make a comment with regard to the Master's Association
meetings which we are always being "encouraged" to attend. I recently
attended the October meeting. I was appalled at the level of un-professionalism
exhibited by the board members. For starters: we were told that our
comments would only be heard for 30 minutes. During that time, we
were constantly interrupted by the board trying to interject their
views and biased opinions. I am sure they never heard a word that
was said, since they had their own agendas. Some of the female members
of the board were so blatant in looking at the sign-in sheet to see
who was making a comment which was contrary to their beliefs and rolling
their eyes like a bunch of high school girls. It was disgusting to
witness. I would like to think we are in a democracy, but the truth
of the matter is that our community is in the hands of a few incompetents
who are more interested in how their resumes read than in looking
out for the good of this community. I encourage more people of our
community to attend these meetings. I do not trust this board to be
working in our best interests." |
|
|
|
|
10-26 |
A
16-yr CPN resident from Claremont sends in: |
|
|
A
REQUEST: That we all become more informed as to how our Metro
District, Master Association and Parks Authority operate. I've read
comments in this forum and heard second-hand comments from neighbors
that indicate we, the homeowners, are not being provided adequate
and timely information from those that we have elected to represent
us. I would suggest to each of the above Boards that they take advantage
of this outstanding web site and post the agenda for each meeting
and post the Minutes of said meetings. This would allow those that
are interested to participate when an issue is important to them.
The elected officials should remember that they are responsible to
the voters every day not just prior to an annual meeting or election.
|
|
|
|
|
10-8 |
Joe
from KnightsBridge comments: |
|
|
"I
have heard talk that there are plans to extend Monarch through to
the commercial developments along I-25. I urge all residents of CPN
to fight this plan. Do you really want another major route through
our community? Especially one that passes by our Elementary School.
If you hear of any plans please work to oppose them. And if you hear
of it, get this information out so we may all join you. Stop turning
CPN into Highlands Ranch." |
|
|
Anybody
know more about this particular topic? Please add
your comments. |
|
9-3 |
a
CPN resident sends this: |
|
|
"I
think there is, not a clash, but a distinction of cultures out here.
There is the group that came here when it really was out on the edges
of nothing much (and that was a good part of the appeal to living
here) and the group that came after the bond was settled and building
was on the upswing. Many of the reasons for the first group's decision
to come live here are disappearing under the weight of the second
group (truly, no offense is meant) who seem to have differing expectations
and wants. Just a thought." |
|
|
|
|
8-29 |
a
CPN resident shares: |
|
|
"We
have lived here since 1986. It is a great place to live and raise
children. We love our home, neighborhood, friends, school etc. The
grocery store (one) will be great for obvious reasons.
But,
since the recent growth, (the past 3 years) we feel the area is
becoming more like Highlands Ranch and less like the area we chose
to move to. If we could make the decision again as to where to move
to, I doubt we would choose this area.
However,
all of the Denver area has changed in character... More pressure
should be put on the builders, the planning and zoning and the commissioners
to make the lots larger. The density is too much. (I know the standard
response is the bond issue.) The pressure cannot come from a few
hysterical homeowners, but it must be a strong voice like the Master
Assoc.
What
happened in Forest Park is a sin, especially the lots owned by Ashcroft.
The greed of the builders and developers will eventually backfire
- water issues, crime issues, lack of a sense of community for everyone
will all add up and create problems so that the special quality
of CPN will be lost forever.
It
really is a shame, because it could have been an area where less
might be best & not an extension of the sea of rooftops of Highlands
Ranch.
Also,
not to be thoroughly negative...there was a recent bit of crime
in HOA1. I think everyone in the area should know what happened
(accurately from the police) so people can be more cautious and
alert. We are not immune to crime and as the area grows more incidents
will occur. That's my opinion!!"
|
|
|
|
|
8-27 |
a
CPN resident from Kings Crossing writes in: |
|
|
"So
long, Pikes Peak... One of the pleasures of returning home from
points north has always been gazing at Pikes Peak from the top of
our exit ramp, just before turning west onto CPN Parkway. It was always
fun to watch the snows come and go on this majestic mountain during
the years. Well, I want a grocery store as much as the next person,
but I'm so sad to see the wall of Safeway (or one of its neighbors)
rising directly in front of this very special view. Progress..(sigh)"
|
|
|
|
|
7-25 |
a
CPN resident from StoneCroft writes in: |
|
|
"With
the opening of the Monarch extension to Quebec the amount of traffic
has increased tremendously. Has the home owners assocation discussed
planting more trees along the west side of Monarch from Stonemont
Dr. north? This could create more of a sound barrier for traffic noise."
|
|
|
|
|
7-22 |
KnightsBridge
resident Jan Killough-Wilhem comments: |
|
|
"We
have lived in Castle Pines North for 2 months and I am surprised
at all the complaints people have! If people are so unhappy about
the deer and rabbits. Why in the world did they move here..."Get
a Life"...Go live in Denver...We are tired of hearing and reading
about your inadequacies of not being able to cope with nature! Contact
Coldwell Bankers. You complainers are much more of a nuisance to
Castle Pines and all of society than any wildlife that resides here!"
|
|
|
Anybody
up for a response in kind or another point-of-view? Share
your thoughts... |
|
|
top
of page |
|
|
|
 |
Articles
are dated:
For
general commentary, the most recent comment is first up.
In
threaded conversations, comments follow in chronological order.
Comments
appearing here are unedited and reflect the views of the commentator.
We offer them in the spirit of community voice.
Add
yours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|